SPDK As IPU Firmware - Part 2

Welcome to the second post in our series on SPDK as IPU firmware. The previous post laid the groundwork for using SPDK on an IPU. Now we’re going to focus on enabling inline, block-level encryption in a more efficient way. If it isn’t fresh in your mind, take a moment to review our example scenario from the last post. We’ll start from there.

Eliminating Data Copies

Now that we have the basic flow working, we make a simple observation. The DMA engine does both encryption and copy operations and it’s aware of the two memory domains. So, couldn’t we ask the DMA engine to do the encryption as part of the copy from the host? Absolutely! But to do so requires a layering violation. The custom NVMe-oF transport is responsible for triggering the copy from the host, and the encryption bdev module decides that the data needs to be encrypted. These are two different layers in SPDK’s architecture, so how can we combine them without crossing the boundary?

To tackle this issue, we allowed requests to the bdev layer to be associated with memory in a memory domain. The NVMe-oF custom transport simply constructs a description of memory in the host memory domain and then forwards the request to the bdev layer without triggering a copy. The bdev crypto module gets the request and it uses the current memory location (in the host domain) as the source of the encryption operation and IPU-local memory as the destination. And just like that, we’re good to go!

Except, what would happen if our example flow didn’t have the data at rest encryption bdev? The memory would be up on the host and the request would traverse the bdev layer, eventually landing in the nvme bdev module where it is going to be sent as an NVMe-oF/TCP request. But we’re just using standard Linux sockets for networking, so there’s no opportunity to do a special TCP send operation from the host memory directly. Barring creative ways to solve that, we need a generic way for components in SPDK to trigger a copy between two domains. And that’s exactly what we’ve done - every memory domain has push and pull function pointers that are filled in when the memory domain is created at start up. Any software can request memory in a remote domain to be pulled to a local buffer, or to push a local buffer to the remote memory domain, which triggers these callbacks. For our example, these callbacks would be wrapped around calls to our DMA engine hardware.

So our DMA framework lets us do the following things:

  1. Describe memory in a remote memory domain, using the appropriate addresses in that domain.
  2. Initiate data transfers between the system memory domain (i.e. regular memory for our SoC) and the remote memory domain without knowledge of the hardware mechanism that does the transfer.
  3. Enumerate the registered memory domains in the system.

This is all upstream and supported in the current SPDK release. The API is defined in include/spdk/dma.h.

Address Translation

For our particular example, the “host” memory domain would have push and pull function pointers that issue requests to our hardware DMA engine. The API supports other simple operations, such as zeroing, which are also obvious enough. However, each memory domain supports an additional, somewhat tricky operation - translate.

An IPU may present more than one PCI “function” to the host. In fact, they almost all do - network function(s) and NVMe function(s). When the host operating system initializes these devices, it very likely configures them to run behind the IOMMU. That means that the addresses used by these devices for DMA are I/O virtual addresses, not physical addresses. And most importantly, there’s no guarantee that two functions are using the same I/O virtual address table. For instance, the host could configure the NVMe function such that address 16 maps to physical address 64, but configure the NIC function such that address 16 maps to physical address 1024.

But why does that matter? Well, what if we wanted to avoid copying data to the SoC memory at all, and send directly on the network? This is unlikely for TCP, but it seems very likely for RDMA fabric backends. Except, in some designs, it’s the NIC doing the DMA at that point rather than the NVMe device. So we need to translate the addresses from the NVMe function view of host memory, which is what we got when the NVMe command arrived, to the NIC view of host memory! The translate function does just that - it translates addresses from one memory domain to another, if possible. This is all implemented as callbacks assigned to the memory domain, because all of this translation is necessarily platform specific.

What’s Next?

That’s all we’ll cover in this post. The next post in the series will handle performing “chained” operations - crypto + DIF insert specifically - without extra data copies and describe the final form the framework has taken.

Check back in a few days for the next post in the series!